www.news-alliance.com

MI5 framed Smacks Mosley in classic Cold War sex-sting using honeypot method!

• Dominatrix wife of MI5 officer admits the Security 'Service' plotted to destroy Max Mosley with 'Nazi' sex slur - News of the World 'newspaper' colluded with spooks and prostitutes to nail Mosley

........................................................................................................... Honeypot www.mistressabi.com

The prostitute wife of an MI5 officer who was paid thousands of pounds for her cooperation in framing Max Mosley has now admitted that the Security 'Service' were involved in the classic Cold War sex-sting on the Formula 1 racing boss.

The pimp MI5 officer and his wife, a whip-wielding dominatrix who flogs sado-masochistic sex to the morally degenerate suburbs, framed Mosley in cooperation with the sex-obsessed News of the Screws - a 'newspaper' more renowned for it's soft pornography than cutting-edge 'journalism'.

The disgraced spook and his whore wife have now described in matter-of-fact terms how an attempt by them to combine their careers ended in high farce, personal disaster and national scandal, with consequences that are genuinely destined to resonate down the ages and again heaped disgrace on the already tarnished 'reputation' of MI5.

Mosley launched a successful court action over the Nazi sex slur, claiming his privacy had been invaded, and secured a victory that has profound implications for free speech in Britain and effectively chokes the mainstream media. This worrying development comes courtesy of a combined plot by MI5 and the News of the World and yet the 'newspaper' has the audacity to claim that the rights of the 'free' press have been violated and curbed.


Above: Neville Thurlbeck, News of the World journo-cop and alleged registered police informant.

But if the sex-obsessed 'newspaper' was not so willing and eager to work with MI5 officers in framing a powerful man who they knew would come back at them in the courts, press freedoms would be unaffacted but as it is the News of the World has inflicted serious harm on the media for decades to come. And Mosley should not be blamed because he was simply out to protect himself and the blame lies entirely with the News of the World and their fellow shysters at Thames House.

The dominatrix Michelle or 'Mistress Abbi', referred to in court as Woman E, had been due to give key evidence at the trial, but in the event went into hiding. She has not yet explained who she was hiding from? Certainly not the News of the World....

But in an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, the dominatrix and her husband describe the background to the Mosley ‘sting’ for the first time, and their willingness to go on record makes a mockery of their claim that they went into 'hiding'. They were in fact holding out for the best possible deal and once her husband had clearance from MI5 to speak-out, they both did so without the MI5 officer breaching the Official Secrets Act.

And they have 'revealed' that the News of the World was initially contacted and tipped off not by the dirty dominatrix, but by her husband – a serving officer in MI5 – who then negotiated a 'deal' with the newspaper. This entirely un-shocking 'revelation' will deepen suspicion that Mosley was the victim of forces beyond those of a greedy sex worker and a scandal-hungry tabloid.

Mosley himself is said to believe that his public shaming was brought about by shadowy, unspecified enemies. The dominatrix Michelle told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I was pleased to leave it up to him. I might be bossy when I am working, but I’m not in my normal life. In any case, he is much better on the phone than I am.’

And the MI5 man who apparently was forced to resign from the Security Service, admits: ‘I am the one who rang the News of the World offering to sell my wife’s story and sorted out the deal before she got involved.’

The couple have gone to great pains to insist that he was acting without the knowledge of MI5 but as the pair go on to describe their extraordinary, yet unsurprising 'story', the questions mount up rather than go away.

First of all, we know at News Alliance that the MI5 officer telephoned the News of the World on a weekday during normal working hours when he should have been hard at work spying on terrorists planning to carry out acts of mass murder. Apparently, he was or still is, a mobile surveillance officer with years of experience.

If he had spare time on his devious hands to telephone the News of the World and pitch the proposed plot to them and the background to the operation to frame Mosley; either the country was not being protected in the so-called 'war on terror' fantasy or more likely, he had the backing of his MI5 bosses to conduct an Information Operation (I/Op) paid for by the taxpayer.

There can only be two possible alternatives in this scenario and either are daming to MI5 as we are told repeatedly that 'thousands of terrorists are planning to attack Britain from within.'

If MI5 bosses have the time to spend or waste on hatching I/Ops against Max Mosley - definitely not a terrorist - then what we are being told about the extent of the threat to the country is a pack of lies and heads should roll starting with Jonathan Evans. But alas, the horrid, nasty little New Labour regime has no control over MI5 and would not campaign for disciplinary action against anyone involved in the Mosley plot because of the NAZI smear.

And this smear brings up another vitally important question, quite easily answered, in that Max Mosley believes he was the victim of 'dark forces' out to get him. So why would those 'dark forces' be out to get Max Mosley long after his father Sir Oswald Mosley, former leader of the British Union of Fascists, had faded from the spotlight and ceased to be a threat to the bent Political and Royal Establishment?



Certainly, the Nazi smear is entirely transparent and is a direct connection to his father's past as leader of the BUF. And in the 1930s, MI5 colluded with Communist thugs to defeat the BUF which culminated in the battle of Cable Street and led to the eventual imprisonment of all of the BUF's senior leaders during WWII under Defence Regulation 18b.

Many people though will not be aware that many of the BUF's activists were strangled to death in British prisons before the end of WWII to ensure their silence was permanent. Allegations on the far Right are always levelled at MI5 and its ersatz Political Police, the not so 'Special' Branch. If there is incontrovertible evidence to pin the murders of BUF activists on MI5 and SB, we have yet to see it but there is no doubt at all that both MI5 and SB were responsible for their imprisonment and subsequent 'protection'....

But these are not lingering motives to frame Max Mosley as a Nazi sex-pest and throws up an even bigger question of who or what has Mosley upset in the world of power politics and shady backroom deals where backstabbing is the norm? Obviously, he knows something or has threatened to expose something and MI5 was called in to deal with him and hatched an Information Operation to destroy him.

The I/Op failed and has now backfired in spectacular fashion and whilst the gruesome twosome of the MI5 officer and his whore 'wife' deny any MI5 involvement - itself a staggering suggestion given he is or was a serving MI5 officer at the time - we do not accept their denials and on past experience at News Alliance we do not accept as true or genuine a single thing that comes out of MI5.

And the 'couple' make a very unlikely match: Michelle (Mistress Abbi) is 38, two years younger than him. She told the Mail on Sunday: 'I am not a hooker or a prostitute. I always refer anyone who contacts me to my website so they know what my rules are. Domination is a professional business.’ And MI5 is and has always been in the business of domination.

She met her future 'husband' at a Butlins holiday camp in 2003 but somehow we just do not see an MI5 officer taking a holiday at Butlins - perhaps he was conducting surveillance on a target?

She has two children, a girl of 13 and a boy of 15 from a previous relationship - God knows what type of 'example' their mother thinks she is setting for them to have a 'decent' life. She was married to a former Royal Marines officer and has a clear penchant for uniforms and power.

She said: ‘I was there with my two children and he had come for a stag party. We started talking and soon got together. I told him what I did on our third date. He knew exactly what I meant, but he said it wasn’t his scene. Three weeks after we met he told me that he worked for MI5. I was a bit shocked, but then I suppose he had been rather shocked about me.’

The MI5 officer should have seen the danger Michelle posed but instead decided not to tell his employers about his new potentially dangerous liaison. ‘If he had discussed it with them they would have capped his career straight away,’ insists Michelle but this again cuts no ice with News Alliance. On the contrary, MI5 has for decades been involved in the filthiest business one could possible think of, including honeytrap stings on Soviet Bloc agents using prostitutes as bait - a tactic borrowed, incidentally, from the old KGB.



But the MI5 officer insists he 'hid' his wife's career from his bosses which throws up another question about MI5's vetting procedures. If the Security Service, tasked to defend the realm against all threats, could not detect one of its officers was compromised by marrying a hooker then what faith can the public have that they are protected from terrorists? Does 7/7 answer that question...?

Therefore, we reject this tale as sheer nonsense and even the Mail on Sunday was circumspect as to their marriage being genuine. MI5 long-ago mastered the 'false flag' operation and a marriage of convenience is not beyond the bounds of the depths spooks will go to in order to nail a target.

And Whitehall 'sources' have also stated they have 'nothing to add' to earlier assertions denying MI5 had anything to do with the Mosley sex-sting. Since when has anyone in the New Labour regime been taken seriously as a 'truth' teller?

Max Mosley has more to worry about than he knows because MI5 officers and the News of the Screws did not target him casually and certainly not because his father was a Fascist leader although that aspect explains the Nazi smear. What he has to worry about is what he really knows and indeed who he has upset.

There is much more to come in the Max Mosley spy scandal and it will come sooner than anyone knows because MI5 is damaged and will seek to strike back through its network of agents and someone will suddenly unearth the real reason why Mosley was targeted....



Leave a comment