www.news-alliance.com

Jeremy Paxman accuses the institutionally left-liberal BBC of fawning over the Monarchy

• But since when has the anti-British BBC not presented biased coverage on any socio-political matter?

Bruiser Jeremy Paxman has attacked his employer the BBC for ' fawning' over the Royal Family and his vitriol will come as no surprise at all to Republicans campaigning for Britain to become a democracy.

The outspoken Newsnight host attacked the corporation for having an 'identity crisis' when covering royal stories, not knowing whether to report or celebrate events. The 58-year-old news presenter said its 'complete confusion' in this area exposed the worst aspects of the BBC's uncertainty over its role.

What is even more uncertain is why the BBC, a fundamentally left-wing organisation pumping out anti-British propaganda, fawns over what is mistakenly regarded as a 'British' institution in the shape of the Royal Family. perhaps the answer is to be found in the number of 'Royals' who are practising members of the idiotic Fabian Society....

But the real reason for the BBC's grovelling to the House of Windsor is good old-fashioned nepotism to ensure licence fees are collected to keep the Fabian Society's favourite propaganda arm pumping out dangerous Marxist nonsense.

The BBC will not 'entertain' anyone who believes Britain should have an elected Head of State and will give no air time to Republicans. This again proves that the BBC is not in the least bit interested in presenting a balanced view of the modern political arena.

And what is more worrying and dangerous is the BBC's wholly unacceptable fawning over the institutionally corrupt New Labour regime. Indeed, the BBC's misconduct during and after the illegal Iraq war and the silencing of Dr David Kelly, must prove beyond doubt that the Beeb is not fit to collect a village tote let alone billions of pounds from the long-suffering British people.

But if the BBC is open, 'fair' and balanced in its reporting, we ask that a series of current affairs programmes be commissioned to explain why so many people now want Britain to become a Republic.

In reality this will never happen because the BBC, New Labour and the disgraced House of Windsor are autocratic and anti-democratic. Therefore, the battle for an elected Head of State will involve confronting and countering the Beeb's propaganda in favour of the undemocratic institution of 'monarchy'.

Republicans offer 'one citizen one vote' but Royalists offer 'one subject no vote'. Which do you prefer in a supposed democracy?

Leave a comment